2019 Agility World Championships – Large Dog Runs Analysis 

 September 25, 2019

By  Daisy Peel

Chispa and I just got back from Turku, Finland, here we competed at the World Agility Championship for Team USA. It was an amazing competition, and although we didn’t come home with a handful of trophies and ribbons (or even one!), we did learn a lot and had a lot of fun. She did amazingly well for such a youngster; at only three, she’s just a bit older than Solar was at his first World Championship back in 2010, and the courses and training required are far more complicated now than they were back then!

Below you’ll find the course maps from the event, as well as my video analysis for each run, including my thoughts about the course as I watched it being built, and after I walked it, as well as my thoughts on how each run went with Chispa, and how I’d do things differently or better! Each video is 15-20 minutes long, and you can watch it here OR download it to watch later (or both!).

Feel free to leave a comment or ask questions using the comment form at the bottom of this page!

 

THE LARGE DOG COURSE MAPS

RUNS AND COURSE ANALYSES

Daisy Peel


Daisy has been on the forefront of the trend of online agility education, and her Online Classroom is one of the leading sources for those seeking to improve the quality of their participation in the sport from afar. Her instruction, whether online or in person, is widely sought after as some of the best instruction available for those at any level, with any type of dog.

Daisy Peel

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Giuliana Lund

Thanks so much for this super analysis and congrats on some great runs! In the Individual Agility run you mention dogs missing the wall jump due to curving in off the threadle on the previous jump. (And this tendency to curve back towards the handler on a threadle may also have contributed to Chispa’s bar on the way to the teeter as she realized a bit late she needed to turn away from you a bit there). This is an issue I have had with Ruki. I know a big part of the problem is me hanging back to be… Read more »

Shela

Thank you so much for doing the analysis. It is way above my pay grade, but wow, it will sure help me in how I look at a course from now on. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to learn.

Kerry Levin

Hi Daisy! So far I’ve just watched your review of Indiv jumping. Can you please explain in more detail what the handling was for #19? I saw other teams do the same thing. Lots of cheering for you and Chispa when you nailed that one! Nice run and analysis.

VivienneBoogaard

Daisy thank you so much for this detailed commentary and explanations that are so clear. You make me want to try and lay these courses out but I don’t have the space, so I will try sections. I love how you don’t put your ego into this activity and you show me that my way of doing “what if” alternatives when I walk is not just indecision on my part (most people have told me to make a plan and stick with it, but things happen…). Thank you so very much, love this. Just wish the maps had measurements on… Read more »

LizDole

Daisy, I really appreciated your thorough and honest analyses. Beautiful threaded—maybe you should write a book. ?? Great job at AWC with your Chispa. ?

LizDole

I think that Landing Side Approaches is a catchy phrase, don’t you think? ?

AngelaSutton

Re teeter flyoff, test whether the issue recurs when you put a teeter parallel and adjacent to the ring boundary. I have seen dog after dog mistake teeter for the dogwalk in local competition in that scenario because they are so used to the DW being placed along one side of the ring.

AngelaSutton

Many thanks !!! Such fun to see how you planned for good and efficient lines and ability to get where you needed to downstream!!

DianeKrumme

Amazing, love the analysis.

jasmer8

Learning so much from this analysis. Thank you Daisy!

mweir13

LOVE IT FAB

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
20
0
Join the discussion and leave a comment!x
()
x